Here is the dispassionate comparison of the Ranger Wildtrax with Defender 110.
From Rader Comparison
Some salient points:
1. Defender is tops in fuel economy 11 km/liter vs. Ranger 8.9 liter
2. Defender comes with a 2.2 liter, 4 cylinder TDI engine with 119 hp, 360 nM of torque
Ranger has 3.2 liter, 5 cylinder 197 hp output engine, with 470 nM of torque (hP double, torque almost even
3. Transmission: Ranger 6 speed AT, Defender 6 speed manual.
4. Airbags: Ranger is equipped with 4 airbags, Defender has none
5. Brakes: Ranger has disc/drum, Defender has disc/disc
6. Price: their price comes close.
I used to an officer (Trustee and Secretary) of the Land Rover Club of the Philippines. This site recalls and relives the past 4x4 offroading experiences. About my experience with Range Rover, Defender and the classic. Land Cruisers - series 40 and series 80. Renegade with SD 33 Nissan engine - the best. We now use for daily use a Subaru Forester. | Land Rover | Range Rover | Renegade | 4x4 | Defender 110 | Jeep | CJ2 | CJ3 | CJ8
4 x 4 Slider Pictures
Sunday, November 3, 2013
Ranger Wildtrax Comparison with Defender 110
Labels:
comparison,
Defender 110,
Ford Ranger,
Rader,
Wildtrax
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment